▲ | rstuart4133 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> you only need to learn very few knots to do nearly everything I see a lot of posts here along these lines. It turns out there is a trade-off between knots: how easy they are to undo vs how likely they are to spontaneously untie, particularly when not under load. Most of the "every knot you need" recommendations here seem to come from people tying things down for a short haul, and consequently come from the the "easy to untie" end of the spectrum. The sheepshank is great for a temporary tie down but obviously falls apart when not under load. Less obviously so does the bowline, figure 8, and most knots composed of half-hitches. A rock climber takes a dim view of knots that spontaneously untie when they aren't looking, so they use a different set of knots. At the extreme are fishermen. A single strand of nylon is slippery, is weakened by kinks, and yet a fisherman's knot must remain secure while drifting in the surf being bashed waves. Consequently, they will use complex, slow to tie knots with 7 or 10 loops. Your knots look to be at the "easy to untie" kind, except the alpine butterfly. If it has been under high load for a while it can be a real bitch to get apart. It's popular with climbers, but I would not recommend it for tying down a load. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | david-gpu 3 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> I see a lot of posts here along these lines. It turns out there is a trade-off between knots: how easy they are to undo vs how likely they are to spontaneously untie, particularly when not under load. Agreed. There are many tradeoffs, indeed. But just because there are ten common knots that can do a bend, it doesn't mean that a person benefits from using all of them -- they all perform the same function, so knowing a single secure bend is enough, especially for a beginner asking these sorts of questions. Personally, I have chosen my knots based on how safe and effective they are, as well as how easy they are to remember, tie, dress, verify and untie after load. The Zeppelin bend is hard to verify against e.g. the hunter's bend or Ashley's -- but it's just as secure as a flemish bend at a fraction of the effort to tie. The double sheet bend is bleh, but I didn't want to get into the weeds of what to do when joining ropes of very dissimilar diameters. > Most of the "every knot you need" recommendations here seem to come from people tying things down for a short haul, and consequently come from the the "easy to untie" end of the spectrum Agreed. I would say camping-style knots tend to be easy to tie, easy to untie, and not adequate for safety critical applications. > Your knots look to be at the "easy to untie" kind If you mean "easy to untie after being heavily loaded", then we agree. If you mean "can become untied accidentally after e.g. intermittent loads", we disagree. They are climbing knots, after all. I specifically did not include knots that are commonly recommended even though they untie easily e.g. under intermittent loads, such as the sheet bend or the bowline, precisely because of how easily they become untied. > It's popular with climbers, but I would not recommend it for tying down a load. I am not in love with the alpine butterfly variations in general, but in the specific context of making a midline fixed loop without access to either end, there's not much to choose from as far as I know. The Figure-8 capsizes in that application, for example. That said, I would rather use an accessory line with a friction hitch (e.g. Prusik loop), but an alpine butterfly is commonly used in safety critical applications as you mention, so I'm curious to learn what you would rather use in that situation. As for fishermen and safety, how do you explain that they still commonly use the bowline or the sheet bend? | |||||||||||||||||
|