|
| ▲ | tene80i 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Irrelevant. You were arguing this was an ordinary part of business, and the point is that it clearly isn’t. Now you’re moving on to how much it matters that the government made such a demand. It matters very much, because it is unprecedented and outrageous. But I was only replying to your partial account, which left out the most crucial aspect of the entire affair. |
| |
|
| ▲ | logicalmind 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Companies are driven by profits, but their decisions are usually based on legalities. I think their knee-jerk reaction to pull Kimmel was due to what might happen, or what the government was threatening to do. That doesn't amount to damages, legally. However, if they bring Kimmel back, and the government follows through on its initial threats, then that does amount to damages for which they can sue the government. |
|
| ▲ | arp242 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They didn't ignore it. The show was suspended for several days. Over some really tame remarks. The warning is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention. |