> Here we have irrefutable evidence of just how bad the result of using AI would be

It's not just the result of using AI, it's the result of failing to vet the information he was providing the court. The same thing could've happened if he hired a paralegal from Fiverr to write his pleadings and didn't check their work.

It's like saying that because he typed it on a computer, it's the computers that are the problem, and we shouldn't keep using them.

We're already at least a year past AI tools having the ability to perform grounding (Lexis+ from LexisNexis, as I cited on another comment in this post, for example), so this whole fiasco is already something from a bygone era.