| ▲ | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3 hours ago |
| > May or may not be Yes, this is my point. It can't be concluded that they are not stealing to meet their needs. |
|
| ▲ | lazide 3 hours ago | parent [-] |
| It certainly can be concluded it isn’t for a direct need, which is not ‘stealing bread to feed starving kids’. |
| |
| ▲ | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > it isn’t for a direct need Well, right, but that's not what I was refuting. | | |
| ▲ | lazide an hour ago | parent [-] | | Stealing to meet abstract secondary needs is criminal for a reason. People don’t sympathize with it because everyone has needs, and if everyone stole to meet them instead of find something more productive to do, society would collapse into anarchy. So yes, I am refuting what you are saying. |
|
|
