Remix.run Logo
time4tea 7 hours ago

Have you seen https://typeflows.io/

It takes your programming language version and turns it into github actions yaml, so you dont need to do any of that sort of thing.

herpdyderp 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It has pricing tiers!? That's crazy, just use https://www.npmjs.com/package/github-actions-workflow-ts

tarkaTheRotter 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Hey - Typeflows maintainer here. We know that there are other similar libraries out there that do some of the same thing as Typeflows, but am hoping to go much much further than anything out there to help out teams struggling with their pipelines. Examples of things on the roadmap:

- workflow visualisations (this is already working - you can see an example of workflow relationship and breakdowns on a non-trivial example at https://github.com/http4k/http4k/tree/master/.github/typeflo...);

- running workflows through an event simulator so you can tell cause and effect when it comes to what triggers what; - security testing on workflows - to avoid the many footguns that there are in GHA around secrets etc;

- compliance tests around permitted Action versions;

- publishing of reusable repository files as binary dependencies that can be upgraded and compiled into your projects - including not just GHA actions and workflows but also things like version files, composable Copilot/Claude/Cursor instruction files;

- GitLab, CircleCI, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps support using the same approach and in multiple languages;

Lots to do - and hopefully it will be valuable enough for commercial companies to pay for!

:)

Arcuru 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Its "pricing tiers" are "always free for OSS" and "TBD" for commercial use.

I like the things I depend on to actually have a funding model, so that's actually more appealing to me than something fully free.

Levitating 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Website barely loads on my old phone and I can't see any examples of the syntax.

tarkaTheRotter 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Hey - maintainer here. Sorry about your bad experience and thanks for mentioning it! The Core Web Vitals test did come back ok - but evidently there's more to do so will get that sorted. (Web design not a strong point! ). The code examples should be showing on smaller screens when in landscape on mobile (they looked awful in portrait) - but will also look at that as well!

Could I possibly ask you to reply with the model of your phone so can make sure it works ok after have fixed?