▲ | Hilift 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unfortunately the state will never be able to stop or prevent it. There needs to be arrests and prosecutions though, and that is where the problems start. For a interesting example, look at California. A few years back, the state reverted medium-serious crimes back to the county for detainment. This moved the cost of incarceration back to the source, however, those inmates cannot be released. So if there is an overcrowding/capacity concern, the low-level offenses such as retail theft are often immediately released even if they are a repeat habitual recidivist offender with no disincentive to offend again. For a vision of the future, look at YouTube videos of walking tours of San Francisco and Oakland. Entire streets for lease, 38% commercial availability rate. The Crocker Mall and San Francisco Centre Mall are empty, the latter for sale, losing over $1 billion in value. Probably doesn't matter though, because most people ditched shopping and do everything online now. https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/auction-san-franci... SF Centre Mall tour https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN3JXQoM9AU SF Crocker Galleria tour https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzuSQSA3brA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | dsr_ 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If only there were some way to substantially reduce the incentive for theft of consumer goods. What could motivate people to theft? They must need something awfully badly. Perhaps fixing the underlying requirements could help. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|