| ▲ | boxed 4 days ago |
| Isn't that just Ubuntu? |
|
| ▲ | babypuncher 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| The "nice defaults" of Ubuntu and Omarchy cater to completely different audiences |
| |
| ▲ | efreak 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Isn't that just tasksel and defaults? Iirc the various Ubuntu flavors each have a package for their default settings... |
|
|
| ▲ | wyclif 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Way, way better than Ubuntu. And it adheres to *NIX philosophy by making all the config editable via text files. |
| |
| ▲ | flexagoon 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | What exactly in the UNIX philosophy says configs should be editable via text files? It specifically talks about CLI tools using plaintext for their I/O to allow piping commands - not about configuration. | | |
| ▲ | wyclif 2 days ago | parent [-] | | It's called the "Rule of Textuality", a component of which is: "Store data in flat text files." This principle recognizes that text files are human-readable, easily editable with any text editor, version-controllable, and can be processed by standard UNIX tools. |
| |
| ▲ | sleepybrett 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | having run ubuntu-server for awhile for my home server.. what config files do i need to edit without a text editor? | |
| ▲ | IshKebab 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | That sounds worse. |
|
|
| ▲ | Perz1val 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yes, but ubuntu made stupid choices most developers don't agree with |
| |
| ▲ | whitepaint 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Like what? | | |
| ▲ | input_sh 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Right now, snap (2016-present). Before that, Unity instead of GNOME (2011-2017), Mir instead of Wayland (2006-2015), Upstart instead of systemd (2013-2017). They always do something custom-made and not adopted by anyone else, only to completely backpedal and go with what everyone else has already been doing. So, even if you like their custom-made solution you'll eventually end up being disappointed. After that, it becomes like a relic that only some frustrated sysadmins like me will have to deal with whenever we interact with some legacy systems, which definitely doesn't help with Ubuntu's overall reputation. | |
| ▲ | slipheen 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The big one for me is moving packages to snap. You can work around it, but that defeats the whole “works out of the box” aspect |
|
|