| ▲ | munchlax 3 days ago |
| From what I've read about it, DuckDB comes close. Regular files, like sqlite, but pg functionality. |
|
| ▲ | OutOfHere 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| If I am not mistaken, DuckDB is suitable for columnar analytics queries, less so for multi-column row extractions. Which PG-like functionality does it offer on top? |
| |
| ▲ | datadrivenangel 3 days ago | parent [-] | | DuckDB does aim to be Postgres compatible from a SQL syntax perspective, but you are 100% correct that it is not optimized for individual transactions. I'm a huge advocate of DuckDB, but strongly consider your life choices if you want to use it as a transactional database. | | |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 3 days ago | parent [-] | | is there something like duckdb but suited for transactional database while still being postgres compatible It might sound confusing but I wish to genuinely have something of a simpler postgres (in sqlite?) and then later if need be, i could migrate to postgres I suppose. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nullzzz 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| No it’s not ”pg functionality”. It’s close to SQL standard compliance but not close to what Postgres has to offer. Also, single transaction writing at a time, in-process etc. |