tldr, surely this article needs an ai summary at the top.

> Hardin threw himself back in the chair. “You know, that's the most interesting part of the whole business. I admit that I thought his Lordship a most consummate donkey when I first met him – but it turned out that he is an accomplished diplomat and a most clever man. I took the liberty of recording all his statements.” ... “When Houk, after two days of steady work, succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications—in short all the goo and dribble—he found he had nothing left. Everything canceled out. Lord Dorwin, gentlemen, in five days of discussion didn't say one damned thing, and said it so that you never noticed.”

- "Foundation", Isaac Asimov

The headings tell you nothing, and doesn't seem to have much to do with the paragraphs under them.

You have to go 2/3rds of the way before you hit this:

> some number of dollars per AI company’s monthly active users going into a collective pool to be distributed out to content creators based on what most fills in the holes

and this:

> You could imagine an AI company suggesting back to creators that they need more created about topics they may not have enough content about.

Did the author not try to compose this thought in their head before they wrote it down? Did the author (or at least one editor) read this before publishing? I wouldn't get away with a sentence like this in 11th grade, and I'm not even from a natively English speaking country.

This seems completely disconnected from the reality that's been unfolding before all of us for the past few years:

> it seems potentially we're on the cusp of a new, better, and maybe healthier Internet business model

Repetition

> It may seem impossibly idealistic today, but the good news is...

then again:

> It may seem impossible...