>>1/3 native

Natives have rights to their homeland.

Do they? More than the property rights of British Londoners to have sold their part of their homeland to someone with enough money? Even foreigners?

We're talking about a small part of the country that's disproportionately expensive that has tried to attract those with money and the side effect of this is natives have chosen to sell up. There might be too much immigration, there might be too much external competition driving house prices up, but I think it's weird to talk about native rights. None of us is truly native here.