This is the bull case for AI, as with any significant advance in technology eventually you have no choice but to use it. In this case, the only way to filter through large volumes of AI output is going to be with other LLM models.

The exponential growth of compute and data continues..

As a side note, if anyone I'm communicating with - personally or in business - sends responses that sound like they were written by ChatGPT 3.5, 4o, GPT-5-low, etc, I don't take anything they write seriously anymore.

▲

JackFr 4 days ago | parent [-]

> As a side note, if anyone I'm communicating with - personally or in business - sends responses that sound like they were written by ChatGPT 3.5, 4o, GPT-5-low, etc, I don't take anything they write seriously anymore.

What if they are a very limited English speaker, using the AI to tighten up their responses into grammatical, idiomatic English?

▲

baobun 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'd rather have broken grammar and an honest and useful meta-signal than botched semantics.

Also that better not be a sensitive conversation or contain personal details or business internals of others...

Just don't.

▲

NewsaHackO 3 days ago | parent [-]

But the meta singal you get is detrimental to the writer, so why wouldn't they want to mask it?

▲

habinero 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

If I think you're fluent, I might think you're an idiot when really you just don't understand.

If I know they struggle with English, I can simplify my vocabulary, speak slower/enunciate, and check in occasionally to make sure I'm communicating in a way they can follow.

▲

NewsaHackO 3 days ago | parent [-]

Both of those options are exactly what the writer wants to avoid though, and the reason they are using AI for grammar correction in the first place.

	▲	habinero 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Thank you for demonstrating my point.

▲

baobun 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Security and ethics.

If those don't apply, as mentioned, if I realize I will as mentioned also ignore them if I can and judge their future communications as malicious, incompetent, inconsiderate, and/or meaningless.

	▲	NewsaHackO 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		But if they are using it for copywriting/grammar edits, how would you know? For instance, have I used AI to help correct grammar for these repilies?

▲

natebc 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I'd rather have words from a humans mind full stop.