As far as I can tell, LinkedIn's content is already 99% LLM generated posts.

The resulting models might be a terrible hybrid distillation of GPT5 and Claude with a strong preference for hustle culture & banal parables.

▲

devoutsalsa 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Evolution of LinkedIn posts over time...

"Should you choose to inscribe the lexical designation 'DOMINATE' within the commentary section, I shall subsequently furnish you with my proprietary methodology for accumulating substantial financial wealth in the millions."

"Comment the word DOMINATE and I'll share my secret method for making millions of dollars."

"yo if u type DOMINATE in comments ill tell u how 2 get mad rich like millions n stuff fr fr no cap"

▲

sixtyj 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Idiocracy movie as a template? :)

▲

Toorkit 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

DOMINATE

	▲	overfeed a day ago \| parent [-]
		"Congratulations on tiur furst step towards financial independence. Next,you may sign up on our online pig-butchering trading platform, and make sure you buy and hold our new Dominus (INUS) shitcoin. We also have drops daily, make sure you hodl, and it will GO TO THE MOON soon. If you invest USD15000, you'll be a millionaire by 2029"

▲

jgalt212 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Seriously, I cannot fathom any real benefit that LinkedIn would accrue from training on the pathologically upbeat pablum posted by its users and bots acting on behalf of its users.

	▲	Tade0 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I have at least one contact who focuses exclusively on pushing his libertarian views with a side of particularly conservative talking points. Honestly I'm curious to find out how the mix of that and what you described looks.

▲

verandaguy 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Frankly, at this point, I’m here for an AI feedback loop leading into model collapse.

Let it burn.