Igrom 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Thanks. This should have been _opt in_, and not opt out, regardless of any LinkedIn newsletter emails that automatically go to the garbage bin.

amelius 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Surprised the EU did not make "opt in" the mandatory default for something like this.

▲

pred_ 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Unlawful processing of data is absolutely not “opt out” by default, and simply assuming that “legitimate interest” applies does not mean that you can allow on opt out.

Here's just a quick reminder that if you're a LinkedIn user based in an EU member state, and if you do not believe that “legitimate interest” applies, you can file a complaint with your national supervisory authority (SA)/data protection authority (DPA); see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_data_protection_autho...

▲

pjmlp 2 days ago | parent [-]

Thanks, complaint sent.

	▲	wuschel a day ago \| parent [-]
		Seconded.

▲

RegW 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm not in the EU but I am in Europe. It was on for me.

From my reading of the article, this is Linkedin (an American company) that has decided to collect data about Europeans - the EU is not involved. Linkedin has decided that making it opt-out is covered by "legitimate interests". So I guess the real issue here is that the rest of you just don't get the option - you are included anyway.

▲

nwellnhof 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Making this feature opt-out is a clear violation of the GDPR. Linkedin claims they have a "legitimate interest" in collecting this data for AI training without consent, but this argument is laughable.

▲

omnicognate 2 days ago | parent [-]

"Legitimate interest" is abused on an absurd scale

	▲	dspillett 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Even as written in the regs "legitimate interest" shouts "we are your preference not to be stalked by advertisers or provide us with free training material, but fuck you and your silly little preferences we want to anyway so here have another hoop to jump through", and it is stretched even further from there.

▲

thrance 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wish it did, but I am not surprised it does not. The EU remains a fundamentally pro-business organization at its core.

▲

PunchyHamster 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Legislation for the AI slop will take few years probably

▲

randycupertino 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Why would they make it opt in? Nobody would sign up for it in that case!

▲

sunnybeetroot 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I am not in the EU and it was disabled by default

▲

torcete 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Thanks. I hate to need to use linkedIn to find a job. This was the cherry on top of the cake.

▲

benterix 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I noticed some companies ask for a LI profile, and sometimes this field is mandatory. So a few years ago I created an empty LI profile, just saying "consultant" started 20 years ago.

Strangely enough, it wasn't a problem at all. They'd still call me, interview me and make an offer. So I believe people overestimate the importance of LI, at least for some cases.

This is an important issue from me because it's the only so-called "social" site that seems somewhat enforced by the system we're living in, so it has been abused in various ways as people believe they have no choice but to share the details related to their education, past and present employment with the general public.

▲

hyperman1 a day ago | parent | next [-]

Facebook for me is much more enforced. A lot of mom&pop stores publish their opening hours on facebook only. Clubs communicate with their members via facebook, so you can't subscribe to the yearly bbq etc without it. Small local sales, events,.... All small things, but death by a thoudand papercuts.

I held out on facebook since last year, but have given in. My wife is my only friend, even if facebook is pushing a never ending desperate barrage of youmightknow mails.

▲

6LLvveMx2koXfwn 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

When I applied for my last job[0], they asked for a LI profile - I explained I didn't have one and why (data privacy concerns) on the application.

0. now my current job!

	▲	randycupertino 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I've definitely seen my coworkers discriminate against interview panel candidates who don't have fleshed out linkedins. They look "sketchy" is what they'll say, one guy routinely compares the dates on the CV against linkedin profile dates and if they don't match flag the person as honesty issues. Also they'll bring up if they don't have enough skill endorsements in core competencies for the roles. I had no skill endorsements so after hearing my coworkers talk about how they check for that I got a few! So aggravating but it happens and people definitely rule out candidates over their lack of visibility on linkedin.

▲

pandemic_region 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Except it was never a cake to begin with.

	▲	masfuerte 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		And it's not a cherry. It's undigested sweetcorn.

▲

sschueller 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Thank you.