That's a bit ... off brand coming from you mozilla. How are the governments going to find and censor things you don't like

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplat... https://archive.ph/ia2z4

I see the link is now broken on their site so perhaps they have thought better. STFU and just make firefox.

▲

johnisgood 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Say what you will, but I do not care who is pushing AGAINST Chat Control, as long as they are pushing AGAINST it.

▲

cedws 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://web.archive.org/web/20240101011830/https://blog.mozi... Looks like it was removed around Nov 2024, ie around the time it became clear American politics was turning tides and Trump would get elected. Regardless of political position, I have no respect for people or companies that have no principled position and pander to $CURRENT_POLITICS.

▲

Ray20 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't think it's a matter of lack of principles or pander to $CURRENT_POLITICS.

This article is simply about justifying political repression. Then the repression proved ineffective, the article became needless, and since justifying political repression is a rather toxic activity, the article was removed.

▲

Vinnl 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It wasn't removed, just moved: https://blog.mozilla.org/blogarchive/blog/2021/01/08/we-need...

Still true that cool URLs shouldn't change, of course.

▲

cedws 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Thanks, what does “archived” mean though?

	▲	Vinnl 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No idea, my guess would be some software migration where it was too much work to copy the old posts over, but I'm not familiar with what happened.

▲

saubeidl 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Breaking encryption of private messaging is not the same as not letting propaganda run rampant and to try to equate them is bad-faith propaganda itself.

	▲	ozgrakkurt 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		What they want in that piece is basically censorship. It doesn’t make it ok if you think that speech is bad