What exactly do you propose such articles say about potential UB? If you are aware of UB, you are also aware that (1) it is extremely difficult (if not impossible) to conclusively determine whether such a thing is UB without retaining a language lawyer at great expense, or ending up in an infinite regress of bickering, (2) simultaneously you know that in practice, arithmetic and bit-wise pointer manipulations need to work for many intended C use cases, so it is highly unlikely that such a thing will stop working in production compilers. Perhaps this places unrealistic trust in the ISO working groups, but the only valid alternative, in my view, is to give up and go back to writing low-level code in assembly where such things have well-defined semantics.