| ▲ | rerdavies 10 hours ago | |
And how exactly does it not qualify as an open source license? Seems to meet the definition as far as I can see. | ||
| ▲ | Cogito 9 hours ago | parent [-] | |
No claim was made that it is not open source. The contention was over if it was a free license or not: > not free software which it is. As F3nd0 said, it's both. | ||