▲ | coldtea 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
>Letting people know you have a product is marketing Google Summer of Code is bad. I don't want a trillion dollar monopoly influencing FOSS. Sponsoring the Linux Foundation can be bad, depending on who does it. Individual people with their donations? Releasing libraries as Open Source is not bad. But if you release them as a corporate behemoth, who employs the people who work of them, and have them assign copyright claims for their contribitions to your corporate entity, it is worse than a community drive FOSS project. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | surajrmal 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Google SoC gives legitimacy to working of OSS to equal terms of having a paid internship. Many of the projects probably don't even meet your description of FOSS. The Linux foundation would not exist if only individuals donated to it. Most OSS suffers from a lack of maintainers with time as they rarely are paid and can't make a living from working on it. Company backed OSS doesn't suffer from this. Most popular "community" projects are held together by an assortment of company backed developers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|