▲ | lapcat 6 hours ago | |||||||
> I did not say the submitted article was history. I did not say that you did say that. > I answered why someone would submit an article with out of date information. And I explained why history is not the same as out of date information. Thus, you have not explained why someone would submit an article with out of date information. Submitting history is fine. Submitting out of date information is not fine, and it wasn't done in this case, because the information continues to be accurate. | ||||||||
▲ | pseudalopex 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> I did not say that you did say that. I did not say you said I said that. My point was it was irrelevant. > And I explained why history is not the same as out of date information. Thus, you have not explained why someone would submit an article with out of date information. There is nothing to explain. Some history is on topic. History includes articles with out of date information. Consider the 1st Linux announcement.[1] | ||||||||
|