| ▲ | hypeatei 14 hours ago |
| This is an open source project that you're not obligated to use nor did you pay for it. Who is it endangering? The license also makes it clear that the authors aren't liable for any damages. |
|
| ▲ | flykespice 14 hours ago | parent [-] |
| ...and what open source software license in the world makes the author liable for damages? |
| |
| ▲ | Yeask 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | None. That is how RedHat makes money. | |
| ▲ | k_roy 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Probably more of lack of explicit liability in the license. | | |
| ▲ | virtue3 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | every OSS license I've ever seen is "use at your own risk" essentially. That's how this whole system works. You find a vulnerability? patch it, push change to repo maintainer. https://xkcd.com/2347 |
|
|
