▲ | nothrabannosir 13 hours ago | |||||||
> 1. Nelson wanted to institute optional micropayments, like 1 cent or fractions of cents to pay to access content. This would mean that nearly everything would have a paywall. Mission accomplished? In real life everything has a paywall. I much prefer a supermarket to the modern internet. I know what I'm getting, I know what I'm paying for it, I can pay cash, and when I walk out it's over. I can see the cost upfront, I can compare different suppliers, I can buy in bulk: I know what I'm getting and what I'm paying. I hate the "$0" internet. | ||||||||
▲ | mystraline 12 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I think you're not seeing the end result of "everything has micro transactions", and how you can't see the content UNTIL you pay. In a grocery, you can see the goods or the box. Nutrition labels have various details. You see the price. You can pay or not. With internet of micro transactions, everything would be gamified to eek out as much money for as little content. You'd have content gatekept behind a paywall, with ads you had to download and watch for a password to unlock. Infinite scroller websites are also infinite money generators. Things in the background would attempt to steal from you by silently paying/downloading content underneath they pay threshold. Every thing would have their hand out demanding money. And with this, in order to enforce, you'd have onerous DRM baked in everywhere. Lest scrapers aggregate and create multiple pricepoint sites to target micro transaction levels. And, in this world, only the rich can access everything. This view of an alternate internet is a hellscape. At least we can block adverts and disable JavaScript. | ||||||||
|