Remix.run Logo
Hizonner 10 hours ago

I was under the impression that, for any FHE scheme with "good" security, (a) there was a finite and not very large limit to the number of operations you could do on encrypted data before the result became undecryptable, and (b) each operation on the encrypted side was a lot more expensive than the corresponding operation on plaintext numbers or whatever.

Am I wrong? I freely admit I don't know how it's supposed to work inside, because I've never taken the time to learn, because I believed those limitations made it unusable for most purposes.

Yet the abstract suggests that FHE is useful for running machine learning models, and I assume that means models of significant size.

benlivengood 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The difference between homomorphic schemes and fully homomorphic schemes is that FHE can be bootstrapped; there's a circuit that can be homomorphically evaluated that removes the noise from an encrypted value, allowing any homomorphic calculation's result to have its noise removed for further computation.

pclmulqdq 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Both of these are correct-ish. You can do a renornalization that resets the operation counter without decrypting on FHE schemes, so in that sense there is no strict limit on operation count. However, FHE operations are still about 6 orders of magnitude more expensive than normal, so you are not going to be running an LLM, for instance, any time soon. A small classifier maybe.