▲ | HarHarVeryFunny 5 hours ago | |||||||
Sure but in the software field a few years is a lifetime. It's taken 8 years to go from introduction of the Transformer (attention paper) to today's LLMs, so I wouldn't be holding your breath waiting for something significantly different or more capable to replace it. It may well take AGI to replace a human "vibe coded mess" fixer-upper. The technical debt you're building up by vibe coding your product may well become a boat anchor well before some product you are fantasizing about materializes to bail you out. If you've somehow vibe coded an MVP good enough to push out to customers, and achieved some degree of success with it, then what you need to keep going is momentum - to be responsive to customer feedback, add new features, etc. If you've built such a poorly designed and flaky MVP that you can't rapidly iterate on it, then that is probably not going to go well. | ||||||||
▲ | jstummbillig 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> It's taken 8 years to go from introduction of the Transformer (attention paper) to today's LLMs I feel this position severely discounts the acceleration that is going on right now and our inherently limited abilities. Humans are not going to ever be significantly better at coding than they are today, and we can literally watch LLMs improve on it, by the month. | ||||||||
|