| ▲ | jansan 14 hours ago | |
I compared this to the QS ranking, where Oxford is still second in the world, and Durham, the new third place in the ranking mentioned in the article is 341. QS ranking does not even rank the first two, London School of Economics and University of St. Andrews. Does anybody know why? Edit: Sorry, I only looked at the Engineering ans Technology ranking. Anyway, QS ranking is vastly different from the Times' ranking. | ||
| ▲ | yorwba 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
The Wikipedia article on UK university rankings has an entire section on the differences to world university rankings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankings_of_universities_in_th... | ||
| ▲ | programjames 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Why does MIT get a 91.6/100 for the "International Student Ratio" while Peking University gets 37.3/100, when they have nearly identical undergraduate ratios? EDIT: Ah, it also includes graduate students. | ||
| ▲ | checker659 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> Oxford and Cambridge are tied for fourth in the 2026 rankings, after falling due to their relatively poor performance in the latest National Student Survey. Nobody reads the article. Apparently not even pg. | ||