▲ | estearum 14 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It really isn't "entirely legal" to deceive people as to how/when/where to cast their vote, and I don't think you'll find much sympathy for the view that it should be even among vigorous defenders of the First Amendment. His conviction was overturned due to lack of evidence of that he knowingly joined a conspiracy (required by the specific statute they charged him under) not because what he did is protected speech. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/icap/wp-content/uploads/sites... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | tbrownaw 12 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Due to high turnout, polling stations are expected to be overloaded and the party I don't like should vote the day after election day" is a fairly standard joke. What he's described as posting isn't that different. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|