Once again an example of "anti-ai people are those who treat LLMs as oracles, not the pro-ai people."

You mean the people who treat AI as it is advertised?

It seems like a very backwards approach to testing a new technology: instead of “let me figure out how to use this tool”, the approach I see a lot is “let me continually use this tool in an known incorrect way”

Of course there is valuable knowledge in understanding limitations but that is not the approach the author is taking here, imo the author seems disingenuous.

Yes, yes, the magic robots are perfect as long as you refrain from actually trying to use them for anything.

Like, the marketing to the general public is, pretty much, these are magic. It’s entirely reasonable to call out their overconfident bullshit.