> on the verge of bankruptcy

> Meta said that to date, Wynn-Williams had not been forced to make any payments under the agreement.

Unless the reporter and MP are willing to show that Meta is lying about that (which presumably can be easily shown by the book's author producing communications), looks like they are trying to imply causation by the framing of the article.

If you have a pending bill that is greater than your liquid assets, then you are on the verge of bankruptcy.

> Meta said that to date, Wynn-Williams had not been forced to make any payments under the agreement.

which is not the same as "Wynn-Williams" is not liable for any damages. Meta is not going to let someone public claim that meta can make them bankrupt, if it wasn't true. Its bad PR.

Its clear that meta has the power to claim breech of contract, but they are choosing _not_ to at this time. I assume in order to force a stop of book being sold.