| ▲ | kleiba 15 hours ago |
| Posted here multiple times before: - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42943973 (02/2025, 473 comments) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25083315 (11/2020, 382 comments) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31042304 (04/2022, 239 comments) |
|
| ▲ | nataliste 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I was reading the comments from the past times this was submitted, and I just wanted a reason to draw attention to this comment from 2020: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25083315#25104589 |
| |
| ▲ | mallowdram 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | We're seeking narrative to explain how and why these things are happening when narratives are how they are happening. When a species relies on inferior and limited tools, it suffers from their use. When the tool is seamless with the problem, it destroys us without us becoming aware. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/15/jd-vance-lie... This article is all we need to know about fascism, the candidate admits this is the central tool they use on the path to gain unlimited power, even The Guardian grasps this but can't extricate from their use, the news is addicted to stories financially: "In a stunning admission, the Republican vice-presidential candidate, JD Vance, said he was willing “to create stories” on the campaign trail while defending his spreading false, racist rumors of pets being abducted and eaten in a town in his home state of Ohio." The central problem is epistemological, the coding of explanations in mythological thought, which is narrative. The myth is the primary causal illusion. That causes that. When we add intent, which is elusive and reduces meaning subjectively, it robs any event of the true meaning load, we create propaganda without knowing it. There's the rub. If we wee the burning bush as just a brushfire, we are sane. See it as the voice of God, we're doomed. | | |
| ▲ | qcnguy 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The Guardian is misleading you. Vance was referring to story in the news sense, not "admitting" that he makes things up. The original video of what he said is here: https://x.com/HunnyBplus3/status/1835326924597366869 JD Vance: "Dana, [stories about Haitians in Springfield] come from first hand accounts of my constituents. I say that we're creating a story meaning we're creating the American media focusing on it. I didn't create 20,000 illegal migrants coming into Springfield, Kamala Harris' policies did that, but yes, we created the actual focus that allowed the American media to talk about this story." > The central problem is epistemological Yes! | | |
| ▲ | mallowdram 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There were no firsthand accounts from his constituents. He never was able to provide a witness. You're using narrative to cover up events that never occurred or were rumors made into narratives. This is the source of the narrative illusion. " "Multiple news reports in September 2024 detailed Senator J.D. Vance's inability to provide firsthand accounts or evidence for his claims that Haitian migrants were eating pets in Springfield, Ohio. When asked for proof, he pointed to anonymous "firsthand accounts from his constituents," which were later refuted by city officials" |
| |
| ▲ | slumberlust 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That typo made my day. Interesting post overall; good food for thought. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dctoedt 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Spaced repetition promotes learning. |
| |
| ▲ | JKCalhoun 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Seriously though, this is the first time I've seen it (and I visit HN daily). | | |
|
|
| ▲ | toxic72 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It becomes more important with each repost |
|
| ▲ | BolexNOLA 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It’s been 7mo and we’re not all here every day. It’s fine. I appreciate the post and discussion it sparked. Why does it bother you? |
| |
| ▲ | dang 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Linking to past threads with comments (i.e. actual discussions) is a longstanding convention here. There's no implied criticism, as other users have already pointed out. We do treat reposts as duplicates when a story has had significant attention in the last year or so (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html), but that's a separate issue. | |
| ▲ | teraflop 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Why are you interpreting it as a complaint, or an expression of being bothered? Occasional reposts are well within HN's norms, and when something is reposted, it's common to link to past discussions for comparison. | |
| ▲ | kleiba 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why do you think it bothers me? I wrote the original comment because previous discussions might be interesting reads. | | |
| ▲ | alashow 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe prefixing with "Previous discussions" instead of "Posted here multiple times before" will not sound like complaining | | |
| ▲ | dang 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's really hard to find a phrase for this that people don't interpret as a complaint or criticism. It took me years before I hit on "Related", which seems just neutral enough to mostly avoid that misunderstanding (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...). | |
| ▲ | falseprofit 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The phrasing was matter of fact. And there is nothing inherently wrong with reposting. Certain other websites have developed a culture opposed to it, but I have yet to see that here. | |
| ▲ | kleiba 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Agreed, I actually tried and go back to change the wording to exactly that, but unfortunately it was already past the editing grace period. But lesson learned for next time. |
|
|
|
