▲ | hugo1789 3 days ago | |||||||
That works if there is enough memory after the "bad" process has been killed. The question is, is it necessary? Many systems can live with processes performing a little bit poorly for some minutes and I wouldn't do it. | ||||||||
▲ | creer 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It's fine that "many systems" can. But there is no easy way when the user or system can't. Flushing back to RAM is slow - that's not controversial. So it would help if there was a way to do this in advance of the need for the programs where that matters. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | michaelt 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> The question is, is it necessary? Many systems can live with processes performing a little bit poorly for some minutes and I wouldn't do it. The outage ain't resolved until things are back to operating normally. If things aren't back to 100% healthy, could be I didn't truly find the root cause of the problem - in which case I'll probably be woken up again in 30 minutes when the problem comes back. | ||||||||
|