▲ | bapak 11 hours ago | |||||||
> Amazon actively avoided being able to track it. Is that real? I find it hard to believe that Amazon effectively accepted stock from third parties "as is" and lost track of where it came from. It's more likely that they don't tell you than they don't track. | ||||||||
▲ | AnssiH 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
No, it is not true, just a common myth. In the seller documentation they say they can track the source of commingled inventory - they achieve this by never putting them on the same physical shelf location. Also mentioned by Amazon spokesman in e.g. this article: https://archive.is/ra6RT > Amazon can also track the original seller of each unit | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | mcherm 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
We know that they would not provide such tracking for those conducting fraud investigations. You can believe they intentionally didn't track the source or that they intentionally refused to share the information to root out fraud; either one is a very bad look for Amazon. I'm glad to see this change. | ||||||||
▲ | hnlmorg 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
That’s a worse situation then because Amazon would then be intentionally withholding data in counterfeiting investigations. | ||||||||
|