| ▲ | copperx 3 days ago |
| Would a CT scanner work better for your use case? (ignoring cost) |
|
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| A high res 2D X-ray is preferable for a PCB, which is nearly a 2D rectangle itself. |
|
| ▲ | arccy 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| don't those have giant magnets.... |
| |
| ▲ | tecleandor 3 days ago | parent [-] | | That'd be an MRI. A CT is, simplifying, an x-ray machine that takes lots of images in slices, then analyze them with certain algorithms to reconstruct 2D and 3D images of the interior of the 'subject'. | | |
| ▲ | cenamus 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Well, not really in slices, but from all angles. So with a computer you can reconstruct the density of whatever you're imaging and also do the slices |
|
|
