▲ | EdwardDiego 4 days ago | |||||||||||||
Except humans learn from your PR comments and in other interactions with more experienced people, and so inexperienced devs become experienced devs eventually. LLMs are not so trainable. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | krageon 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
If they're unmotivated enough to not get there after four review rounds for a junior-appropriate feature, they're not going to get better. It's a little impolite to say, but if you spend any significant amount of time coaching juniors you'll encounter exactly what I'm talking about. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | org3 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Some people say we're near the end of pre-training scaling, and RLHF etc is going to be more important in the future. I'm interested in trying out systems like https://github.com/OpenPipe/ART to be able to train agents to work on a particular codebase and learn from my development logs and previous interactions with agents. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | shepherdjerred 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
LLMs can learn if you provide it rules in your repo, and update those rules as you identify the common mistakes the LLM makes | ||||||||||||||
▲ | 300hoogen 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
retarded take | ||||||||||||||
|