| |
| ▲ | zem 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | the whole US visa morass is complicated and volatile enough that a lot of large companies have dedicated teams who help advise their employees on visa issues and how to best navigate them. this "guidance" is basically saying "this is our lawyers' best guess as to how to stay safe over the next few weeks" | | |
| ▲ | nomel 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I was confused, because it does not apply to current Visa holders: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45316226 I thought maybe the company was doing something shady, for it to apply to them. | | |
| ▲ | zem an hour ago | parent [-] | | that was not at all certain yesterday, and even now there's the constant fact that a border agent can decide to be nasty and use this as a pretext to deny you entry, with no real recourse on your part. as a parallel example, trump recently decided that you could no longer get your visa stamped in a third country (which a lot of indians did as a matter of course, because wait times for an appointment can be very high back home). there was an explicit carve out for people who had already made appointments at some third country embassy, but a lot of those people went to their stamping appointment and not only did not get the renewal but had their existing visa cancelled (which is apparently within the powers of the embassy official), so they could not even return to the US while waiting for an appointment date in their country of residence, and are basically on unpaid leave right now (best case scenario, would not be too shocked if some of them lose their jobs if they are away for too long). | | |
| ▲ | nomel an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't understand your comment. My reply was today, in response to a comment that was posted less than an hour before mine, both hours after this was announced. How is yesterday relevant? | | |
| ▲ | zem an hour ago | parent [-] | | microsoft sent their letter out when it was highly likely the new diktat applied to existing visa holders too. they had very little time to respond if they wanted to make sure people got home before the absurdly short deadline. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | __MatrixMan__ 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Companies have rights in the US, you can't just keep their employees out. | | |
| ▲ | nomel 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's not generally true, of course. It requires they're legally employed, and have the proper work visas. I was confused. I thought the company was doing something shady, for it to matter, since it doesn't apply to current visa holders. |
| |
| ▲ | mulligan 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | companies are contacting employees who are out of the US, for whatever reason |
|