▲ | asa400 3 days ago | |
The parent quite literally made a normative statement and I disagreed with it:
If nothing else, this is attempting to define what counts as valid collaboration, and it's a definition I reject, so I disagreed with it. Good-faith experience reports are valid, useful, pro-social collaboration. Doing so is a perfectly productive way to criticize.
Apparently they do. The parent even made a veiled accusation that the author writing a good-faith blog post on their own blog about their own experiences "can even be seen as self promotion". Since when is sharing your good-faith critique about the design of a tool you've used something underhanded or nefarious?Setting the bounds of valid community collaboration to "people can post on their own blog as long as I like it otherwise they're being mean" is not a set of values I subscribe to, so I felt it was worth it to articulate that. | ||
▲ | Intermernet 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
"Good-faith experience reports are valid, useful, pro-social collaboration." Good-faith reports would be made directly to the Zig team. |