> 13-year-old ... schoolgirls in short skirts with either bare legs or stockings

why would one post these in the first place?

Because you're telling your friends that Susie is going back to school starting year N, and that's the uniform Susie wears to school, because the school requires it. If I drive down the nearest arterial street to my house at the right time of the day, I'll see probably 100 girls in essentially that uniform on their way to or from several different schools.

Now, given that that uniform is fetish wear on porn sites, you could argue that maybe the schools should stop requiring it. It's not even the biggest among the many reasons you should be making that argument, actually. But the reason for posting the pictures is pretty obvious.

▲

anuramat 10 hours ago | parent [-]

Of course, but why post it publicly? I personally keep all my accounts private even though I am not a 13 years old girl, so I don't get why you would expose your children like that

With or without ads, there's gonna be a certain amount of "unwanted attention", if it's publicly available

	▲	zrobotics 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		FTA: "One mother said her account was set to private, but the posts were automatically cross-posting to Threads where they were visible." With as convoluted as Meta's privacy pages are and how scattered all the settings are, this would be a super easy mistake to make. I could definitely believe that that mother may not have even known what Threads is, much less that her photos were being automatically cross-posted.