There are studies regarding that: almost half of S&P 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children https://www.brookings.edu/articles/almost-half-of-fortune-50...

▲

nwienert 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

This doesn’t really tell us much, and isn’t really relevant to H1B either. If we had 0 immigration, all S&P 500 companies would be founded by non-immigrants.

▲

dalyons 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

This is a useless “technically correct” rejoinder. Yes, the top 500 would by definition still have 500 companies in it. Yes, the net value of the s&p would almost certainly be lower without the innovation brought by immigrant founders. Which is obviously the point being made.

	▲	nwienert 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		H1B started in the 90s, when the economy was at all time highs, and since then growth has been less impressive. It is your comment in fact that decided to assume I missed the point, while assuming something that’s almost certainly not easy to assume.

▲

estebarb 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That is half true. It also would be a USA without Apple, Nvidia, Google, Tesla, Intel, Qualcomm, Yahoo, Paypal, eBay, Pfizer, P&G, Goldman Sachs...

	▲	3 days ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

outworlder 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Not really. Companies would still be founded, but there's no way to tell if they would ever grow to the point that would be listed in the S&P 500.

	▲	nwienert 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Not sure if you don’t know how they define the S&P, or straw-manning.

▲

4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

l___l 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Fortune Global 500 Companies might be a better list. 139 US companies made the list in 2025 which is 27.8%.

https://us500.com/fortune-global-500

▲

h1bnotfound 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]