Remix.run Logo
gruez 16 hours ago

>It was all milquetoast,

???

It was a very obvious dig at the president. There's still not good justification for the government to step in, but claiming it's "milquetoast" is baffling.

derefr 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Digs directed at the President or the administration are and always have been well within the Overton window in American journalism, and previous Presidents and administrations have just seen them as a fact of life and brushed them off.

Thus “milquetoast”: an implication that any reaction to this is, objectively, an overreaction.

That the current President is a habitual over-reactor does not change that fact. It just means that you can paradoxically be taking a heterodox / outré stance by saying objectively milquetoast things.

add-sub-mul-div 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have you ever seen a late night show? Monologue jokes about the sitting president practically define the format. Every other president going back decades would just man up and take it.

wvenable 16 hours ago | parent [-]

Except Nixon.

macintux 16 hours ago | parent [-]

For all his flaws, Nixon had a far thicker skin than Trump and infinitely more integrity.

cratermoon 15 hours ago | parent [-]

Nixon didn't have a thicker skin, he was just more patient and calculating in his revenge. Have we already forgotten his "enemies list"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixon%27s_enemies_list

djohnston 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I guess it depends on the sort of media you consume. I’ve seen Destiny saying conservatives need to be afraid of getting shot, and it seems like he’s still alive.

The other people who lost jobs seemed to have said much more direct and offensive remarks than Kimmel as well.