| ▲ | paxys 4 days ago |
| The trump administration has not complied with any unfavorable court ruling about immigration why would they care about this one? |
|
| ▲ | rayiner 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| The one ruling they arguably didn’t comply with was overturned by the Supreme Court, who held the district court didn’t even have jurisdiction in the first place. |
|
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They've complied with a number of unfavorable court rulings about immigration, but precisely because that's what they're supposed to do it goes much less viral. |
| |
| ▲ | paxys 4 days ago | parent [-] | | "Yeah they're breaking laws, but why aren't you talking about the ones they are following?" | | |
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I do! This dynamic drives it as well. A lot of people on social media are passionately convinced that "Trump can do whatever he wants" is the anti-Trump position and "Trump's power is still limited in many ways" is therefore a pro-Trump position. I never know how to engage with that perspective other than to say it doesn't sound right to me. If you're an anti-Trump person trying to figure out how to stop him from doing bad things, it seems pretty important to know that lawsuits are a useful component. |
|
|
