They all know that. These are politicians. They know they’re misrepresenting the data. They don’t care, they consider it to be part of the job, and they’re not wrong. That’s it.

▲

C-x_C-f 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I did considered that but then went with Hanlon's razor [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

	▲	halfcat 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You seem good at using the tools of data. Stick to that. We need more people like you. Don’t let clever phrasing dim your shine. Hanlon’s razor is in that group of things the expert class is supposed to say so the expert class doesn’t use the tools of data on their masters and attempt to convict them. Along with Occam’s razor, correlation does not imply causation, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, data is not the plural of anecdote, let’s agree to disagree, no one can beat the market, and so on. These all throw out the baby (Iran-Contra, etc) with the bath water (flat earth, etc), tend toward curbing scrutiny, and let someone off the hook. All of these sayings are worth considering, and red flags, at the same time.

▲

rayiner 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How are they “misrepresenting” the data? The comparison as stated shows that the foreign born share of the workforce is growing faster than the field as a whole. The point is that foreign workers are becoming a larger share of the workforce.

They didn’t say that foreign workers got more of the jobs in absolute terms than native workers. That would be truly disastrous.