▲ | jameshart 4 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overall the US economy employs about 800,000 software engineers, with 200,000 or so of them being H1B holders. Now you can argue you would prefer that those 200,000 jobs go to Americans, but on the scale of the overall economy, it really doesn’t matter. What’s far more important is the massive impact those 800,000 software engineers have on the rest of the economy. Four million IT jobs, the entire finance and healthcare and retail industries that are propped up on technology built by those people; whole technology companies like Uber or doordash that create entirely new labor markets. Risk 25% of that capacity on the idea that we would rather have those industries built solely on domestically-grown engineering talent? Why would that be a good tradeoff? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | mbac32768 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's ludicrous. US companies will not be able to dig up 200,000 qualified software engineers in the domestic population while every other skilled profession is experiencing a similar brain drain. The prospect of a $100k/year/employee visa tax makes opening an office in Europe so much more compelling. I guess the people who can't be offshored will see their salaries go up so that's cool? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|