▲ | BinaryIgor 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I've revisited this idea/protocol a few times and still have my doubts: * is there even a need for it? I would say that most people are quite happy with centralized platforms; I don't see it changing anytime soon (why?) * wouldn't we end up in the centralized world anyways? Even though there could be multiple NOSTR clients and relays, we all know how network effect works - people will flock to a single or a few best ones; does it really change the situation that we have today - a few centralized platforms? * I don't see clear incentives in this protocol that would improve current social media landscape - granted that I don't particularly like current ads/sell your attention model I am not sure that having a protocol like this is better that having a few centralized platforms - today's situation. Not to even mention technical challenges and worse user experience that NOSTR brings | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | jasonvorhe 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It's quite common for people with rather controversial topics to have backup accounts listed in their bio because centralized platforms are so prone to deplatforming people. If that's acceptable to you, then nostr probably isn't for you. I prefer not to beg anyone for permission to publish my opinions on the internet. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | phaedrus30 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
[dead] |