▲ | lithocarpus a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't see how over time we could get to a place where an entity with orders of magnitude less computing power can run AI that is anywhere near as powerful as the huge companies. Maybe for certain narrow applications, maybe even for many such applications, but hard to imagine it happening in a way that un-concentrates power. Though certain novel uses could lead to new individuals or entities gaining power. I'd like to be hopeful and would like to hear good arguments for how this could happen - but it seems to me improved technology on the whole leads to increased concentration of power - with exceptions and anomalies but that being the dominant trend. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | SirMaster a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I am sure the same thing was thought about never getting to a point where every person would have a tiny computer in their pocket that was orders of magnitudes faster than the multi-million dollar computers that took up whole rooms and were only owned by the largest companies. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | JackFr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If you take human brains as the limit (a questionable assumption) they do it all for 20 watts (and hardware that makes itself!) The training is often years and can be expensive. In all seriousness though there’s plenty of room for improvement both in current models and hardware. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | JackFr a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Apologies for the bad form of replying twice…) > it seems to me improved technology on the whole leads to increased concentration of power Which is why we are dominated by IBM, AT&T, Kodak and Xerox. |