▲ | JustExAWS a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What were those “gaps”? There were decent compilers and IDEs at least in the mid 90s. MySQL was available for free in 2000 and anyone could download any number of language runtimes for free like Perl and Java. If your corporate overlords weren’t cheap (or you were in college) an MSDN subscription was amazing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | gkoberger a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sure, things existed. mySQL is a great database, but so is Mongo and so is Clickhouse and so is Firebase, etc. Those alternatives all filled a gap MySQL couldn't, and now the bar for creating a new type of database is significantly higher because there's fewer gaps (schema-less, good for logs, good for fulltext search, realtime, etc). JavaScript has been around for decades. But jQuery made it so much easier, and then React built on top of that even more. And jQuery wasn't the first DOM library, nor was React the first framework – but both were where it seemingly clicked between ideas, usability and whatever else made them successful. (I will agree that Microsoft had a run of things where anyone who bought in to their ecosystem had a lot of things that worked well together.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | pixl97 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Those IDEs sucked compared to what you can download in 5 minutes for free today. The number of libraries available (and where you could find them) was miniscule, and most had very bad documentation for beginners. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|