Yes, but this relation does but apply to statistical mechanics and statistical physics, they mean the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_mechanics

What is included in "statistical physics" that is not included in "statistical mechanics"?

▲

chermi 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Kinetic theory stuff for one, like deposition, growth, sandpile type things. Complex networks and lots of dynamics stuff falls under statistical physics umbrella but not statistical mechanics. Stat mech's amazingly wide applicability makes it easy to think it's THE approach to approaching things statistically, but it's not. The broad encompassing approach has a name, statistical physics.

▲

northlondoner 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

There is a distinction. Usually statistical mechanics means the ensemble theory and partition functions that connects microscopic systems to macroscopic ones from material point of views. However, statistical physics is a bit more generic, for example complex networks may not use ensemble theory or partition functions and could use only statistics on the network, such as average neighbourhood or similar.

▲

kgwgk 4 days ago | parent [-]

People have also used “statistical physics” to refer to the former concept since forever. For example Landau.

“Statistical mechanics” is also used in a broad sense, just like “quantum mechanics” is often used for anything “quantum”.

▲

nakamoto_damacy 4 days ago | parent [-]

What I'm getting from this discussion is that we use Statistical Physics to refer to anything covered by Statistical Physics AND Statistical Mechanics, while we use Statistical Mechanics in a narrower context, but it is also possible that some use SM loosely.

	▲	kgwgk 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		> it is also possible that some use SM loosely I think it’s frequent. For example: https://teach-me-codes.github.io/computational-physics/the_p...