I agree that he's not that bad, but he's definitely not 100% accurate, in particular with respect to Intel.

Notably this is about the 3rd time in 2 years that he's reported that the Intel dGPU efforts are being killed off.

Even on the latest developments the reporting is contradictory, so someone is wrong and I suspect it's him. https://www.techpowerup.com/341149/intel-arc-gpus-remain-in-...

▲

gregbot 2 days ago | parent [-]

So far everything he said in that video has happened and he did not say that intel would never release another dGPU just that it would be a token release which is absolutely exactly what has happened

▲

dralley 2 days ago | parent [-]

IIRC the "token release" claim was more of a cleanup after the first and strongest version of his "reporting" didn't really pan out. IIRC he also said that there would be no gen 3 dGPU release after the "token" gen 2 dGPU release and that doesn't seem accurate if the gen 3 dGPU efforts still exist 2 years later, in order to be cancelled now.

	▲	gregbot a day ago \| parent [-]
		Do you know how many dgpus has intel shipped in the past 3 years?