| ▲ | camhart a day ago |
| If the video is encoded using a codec your hardware doesn't handle, it would be left up to the CPU to decode. Av1 can slow everything down to a crawl over CPU. You'd think the browser would be smart about the stream selection though. |
|
| ▲ | jsheard a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's intentional on YouTubes end, they aim to serve more bitrate-efficient codecs wherever possible, even if it's a high burden on the client due to a lack of hardware acceleration. They'll only fall back to older codecs if the client is completely incapable of handling the modern ones. It's annoying but at their scale it no doubt saves them a shitload of bandwidth. |
| |
| ▲ | cwillu a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Classic externality: at their scale, the power costs offloaded to their clients will also be enormous. | |
| ▲ | csdreamer7 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | It also encourages users to upgrade to newer hardware since older devices are known to get slower as they age due to software increasing complexity and hardware mitigations (yes, they are also for phones). Most users will just blame the device. Not saying that is the cause of this slow down, but since the mpeg4 patents don't expire till 2027(?) (and one of those patents prevents hardware decode on Linux) we as a society have given Google every incentive to do this and I welcome them to make mpeg4 irrelevant. | | |
| ▲ | Gud a day ago | parent [-] | | My laptop is held together by Gaffe tape. There ain’t no upgrade in sight |
|
|
|
| ▲ | lxgr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I believe Youtube's player is driving codec selection, not the browser (i.e. the player requests a list of supported codecs and then picks the one most beneficial for Google, not the other way around). That said, I've solved this problem for myself on macOS and Firefox by setting media.webrtc.codec.video.av1.enabled to false on about:config, as all other codecs used by Youtube are hardware accelerated on my Mac. |
| |
| ▲ | zamadatix a day ago | parent [-] | | > I believe Youtube's player is driving codec selection, not the browser (i.e. the player requests a list of supported codecs and then picks the one most beneficial for Google, not the other way around). The way the browser can still participate in choosing is by e.g. not listing AV1 as supported when there is no hardware decoder on the local system. Both Safari and Edge took (approximately) that style of approach, but it comes with the downside that if the server only has AV1 video then the client gets nothing. Practically, that downside isn't a big deal until codec support is high enough sites start assuming the codec is just supported and they don't need to host alternative options. | | |
| ▲ | lxgr a day ago | parent [-] | | Yes, I think Safari even did so dynamically based on the mac being plugged into external power or not for a while, which I think is a nice compromise. Apparently, there's even an API attribute that indicates whether a given codec is power efficient (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MediaCapabi...), which Google must also be ignoring – not their problem, after all. (I wonder if anybody did the math of the opportunity cost of losing a few ad impressions due to the user's battery dying early vs. the incremental bandwidth cost?) |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nine_k a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I run an extension that allows to automatically request h.264 streams from YouTube even when av1 is also available. Saves a lot of CPU, at the cost of some bandwidth. |
| |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese a day ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s funny that this kind of browser extension has recurred over the years. Originally it was to replace the awful CPU hog flash player with an HTML5 h.264 player[1], then it was to sidestep YouTube’s insistence on VP* codecs, and now it’s to sidestep AV1. [1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20110302145602/http://www.vertic... | | |
| ▲ | ryandrake a day ago | parent [-] | | In a beautiful world, there would be a link to each codec to let the user decide, or the browser itself would override the web site's preference and provide such links. It's sad that we keep having to resort to browser extensions to circumvent terrible web site and browser software. | | |
| ▲ | alex_duf a day ago | parent [-] | | I guess in a beautiful world we'd have hardware accelerated, patent free codecs. Which is almost what AV1 is, native hardware decoding is slowly slowly progressing |
|
| |
| ▲ | lxgr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Assuming you have hardware support for VP9 as well, setting media.webrtc.codec.video.av1.enabled to false on about:config achieves the same outcome without an extension. | |
| ▲ | yonatan8070 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | What's the name of the addon? I recall h264ify but not sure about it | | |
| ▲ | wing-_-nuts a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Yep, that's what I use. It took youtube from using 100% cpu, to the point where my little xps13 was thermal throttling, to 50% cpu running 1080p at 2-3x speed. | | | |
| ▲ | nine_k a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | What I run is https://github.com/alextrv/enhanced-h264ify I looked now and noticed that I actually reject VP8 and VP9 and accept AV1. I run Linux on a Ryzen 4750U, for the record. It did not have trouble chewing through VP8 / VP9 without skipping frames, but it ran unpleasantly hot. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
