▲ | byroot 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> What we've witnessed over the past week Who is "we"? And what did they witness? All we got right now is one side of the story. It is indeed surprising such change wouldn't be immediately followed by a public announcement, but they've been founding and managing RubyGems for a very long time now, so it's not even clear to me how this can be a "takeover". I'll happily join with my pitchfork if it turns out this is indeed a malevolent move, but until I've read their side of the story, I'd rather wait and see. Edit: 35 minutes later, here we go: https://rubycentral.org/news/strengthening-the-stewardship-o... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | tremon 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All we got right now is one side of the story That's because Ruby Central chooses not to communicate. I'm not going to reserve judgment against intentionally mute hostile actors. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | bradly 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> All we got right now is one side of the story Well, we have all of Ruby Centrals actions including their action to not be more public during these actions. Their actions are their story. If their actions don't communicate their intent, that is on them to handle that in a professional way to not be in this situation. |