▲ | 64d032fe 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hard, in this sense, does not necessarily mean negative or bad. And the safety nets are often illusions (see: insurance, for one example). There's a balance of course, but I believe most people would benefit from harder lives (in the natural/physical sense). Modern life being more comfortable and easier is actually bullshit. If your life is driving through traffic hours a day to go to a place to sit in front of a computer by yourself to send out messages by chat and email, that is a very hard life. You are forsaking nature and an eon of evolution to satisfy what exactly? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | buran77 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Hard does not mean negative or bad It does when it applies to your life. (Edit to reply to your edit) A bit of physical activity doesn't make your life harder. A lot of it might. And almost only hard physical activity is pure punishment, even literally used as such in labor camps. > the safety nets are often illusions Safety nets are sometimes illusions, they are mostly helping. Like an airbag they only need to work once to prove their worth. > see: insurance, for one example Insurance saved the livelihoods of millions of people, sometimes many times over. Rebuilding houses, repairing equipment, covering medical expenses, or critical services. Sometimes they fail you. Do you know many people who wish for a hard life? For the homeless life? To not have any sort of insurance? > There's a balance of course [...] You are forsaking nature and an eon of evolution to satisfy what exactly? The balance. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|