The future of web browsing is the tiktok model. Where you don't surf the web, but the web is served to you "algorithmically". Do it long enough, and you'll be serve the pages you want and it will feel like it was your idea all along. Gemini everywhere is the first step.

▲

thwarted 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

An infinite number of people at an infinite number of computers will eventually be served the content they desire.

▲

OtherShrezzing 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’d assume one step further, that the human-centric web isn’t what’s served to you, it’s just generative content created on the fly to suit your mood.

Think TikTok, except where the platform is both curator and creator.

▲

ascorbic 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Why stop there. Let the AI consume the content too, and then every day it can just serve a report saying that it consumed 1024 pieces of content and that this led to an increase in its satisfaction level.

	▲	macNchz 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Recording videos to send to our AI Tamagotchis so they don’t start complaining that they’re bored.
	▲	typpilol 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Lmao. No wonder Google fixed their bot views recently on YouTube. We're coming to this.

▲

therein 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh, I just got this dystopian image in my mind where you don't even talk about memes from content made by humans anymore and all you get are weird themes inserted into your custom generated content.

So just like how we don't watch the same thing at the same time anymore due to on-demand media, and the talking about yesterday's big TV show is only a thing of the past now. It will be one more step removed from that and you will have kids talking about this random thing that appeared in their custom show yesterday. Conversations like "dude, did you also get that singing toilet in your stream yesterday, what was that about".

▲

542354234235 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Or you will get the pages that are good enough to hold your attention, while being short form enough to keep giving you small constant dopamine hits. Nothing too interesting or too long, keeping you chasing more hits, to prevent you from feeling like you really "finished" something significant, since that might feel like a stopping place and cause you to go do something else.

▲

esperent 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wouldn't gave a major problem with this if the algorithms were tuned to my benefit. In fact, I probably prefer it since most of the web is noise that I don't need to see. So the problem isn't algorithmic content, it's closed source algorithms designed to benefit the company that made them rather than the user.

	▲	mikae1 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		> I wouldn't gave a major problem with this if the algorithms were tuned to my benefit. Due to the laws of enshittification they will eventually never be tuned to your benefit.

▲

xnx 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe, but that sounds a lot like Google Discover, which is part of Android, the Chrome new tab page and (sometimes?) the Google home page.

	▲	sandspar 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Google Discover is also remarkably bad at serving me stories I want to read, at least in my experience. One of those products that I wished worked better.

▲

lxgr 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's arguably not browsing the web, that's watching TV.

Nothing wrong with that, in theory and in moderation.

▲

_el1s7 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No, that doesn't make any sense, because the web is not a social media.

	▲	siva7 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		For most humans, it is.

▲

isodev 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That’s the future if we leave it to the tech bros. As humans we can and should do better though.

▲

woodrowbarlow 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

i legitimately miss stumbleupon.