▲ | citizenpaul 4 days ago | |||||||
I've been downvoted before for saying my take on this but... Its because SE is a low class low power field. Its not respected by the people in charge at the overwhelming majority of companies. It has resisted standardizing like lawyers, doctors or even real estate agents. So there is little leverage a person in the field can push back with. Its mostly just seen as an annoyance to gaining/consolidating power for the power brokers on their way up the ladder. That really is what computers/software are. Huge engines for orchestrating power that kings of old couldn't dream of. | ||||||||
▲ | Jensson 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> It has resisted standardizing like lawyers, doctors or even real estate agents. You can't standardize a field that changes so fast, it takes decades to standardize a field and there has never been a point in time of software where two decades didn't completely changes the job. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | prmph 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
This is the absolute truth. And the worse news is: it will never change. There are several things fundamental to SWE, at least the corporate, open source, and/or indie flavors, that ensure it will not be standardized. | ||||||||
▲ | jnwatson 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> "SE is a low class low power field" This is the difference with FAANGs. Software engineering is king. The inmates are running the asylum. Google is at least 4x as efficient as other large companies I've worked for. Nearly every internal process that can possibly be automated is. | ||||||||
|