| ▲ | rapind 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> American competition isn't a zero sum, and it's in Nvidias' best interest to keep the market healthy. Looking at Google's recent antitrust settlement, I'm not sure this is true at present. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tonyhart7 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Google literally "won" antitrust case ??? the fact that google pay firefox anually meaning that its in best interest of google that there is no monopoly, judge says | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lacy_tinpot 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nvidia's options are fund your competition to keep the market dynamic, or let the government do it by breaking you a part. So yes. That's how American competition works. It isn't a zero sum game. We try to create a market environment that is competitive and dynamic. Monopolies are threat to both the company and a free open dynamic market. If Nvidia feels it could face an antitrust suit, which is reasonable, it is in its best interest to fund the future of Intel. That's American capitalism. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||